Lab based

High cost

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A testing) in IVF

Testing embryos to check whether they have the expected number of chromosomes

Relevant for

Repeated implantation failure, Repeated miscarriage, Older female age

Also known as:

PGT, Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), Genetic testing, Chromosomal screening

Quick evidence overview

More trials added

Last updated 13 Jan 26

Cumulative live birth

Unclear

It is unclear whether PGT-A affects the overall chance of having a baby from multiple embryos transfers

Cumulative pregnancy

Possible decrease

PGT-A may decrease the overall chance of getting pregnant from multiple embryo transfers

Miscarriage

Decrease

PGT-A decreases the chance of having a miscarriage from IVF

What is Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A testing) in IVF?

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) in IVF involves testing embryos to check whether they have the expected number of chromosomes.

  • Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) is a screening test to check how many chromosomes an embryo has. Chromosomes are packages of DNA in each cell in our body. Embryos typically have 23 pairs of chromosomes (46 in total) in each cell.
  • Euploid embryos have the expected number of chromosomes (46 chromosomes).
  • Aneuploid embryos have too many or too few chromosomes. A missing chromosome is referred to as a monosomy (one copy), and an extra chromosome is referred to as a trisomy (three copies).
  • Segmental aneuploidy is when only a specific segment or part of a chromosome is duplicated or deleted, rather than the whole chromosome.
  • Aneuploid embryos are usually unable to lead to a successful pregnancy and can be associated with low pregnancy rates, miscarriage, or the birth of a baby with a chromosome condition. An example is Down syndrome (trisomy 21), a condition caused by an extra chromosome.
  • Embryos with extra or fewer chromosomes are common. The percentage of embryos that are aneuploid increases with female age.
    • Among 30-year-olds, 20-30% are aneuploid.
    • Among patients over 40, more than 50% are aneuploid.
    • At 45 and older, over 90% are aneuploid.
  • The PGT-A process requires taking 3-10 cells from an embryo which has 70-150 cells – this is called an embryo biopsy. All embryos are frozen while waiting for the PGT-A test results. The cells are taken from the outer layer of the embryo called the trophectoderm (see illustration below). These cells become the placenta in a pregnancy. The cells are analysed to determine whether they have the expected number of chromosomes.
  • PGT-A was previously called preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and is sometimes referred to as PGT.

PGT-A results and mosaic embryos

    • Euploid: expected or typical number of chromosomes and suitable for embryo transfer
    • Aneuploid: extra or fewer chromosomes (or parts of chromosomes) and not usually suitable for embryo transfer
    • Mosaic: a mixture - some cells have the typical number of chromosomes and some cells have extra or fewer chromosomes.
    • No result (inconclusive): the test did not work due to an insufficient biopsy or a technical problem with the test (approximately 2-10% of embryos). If this happens, you may be given the option to:
      • Transfer the untested embryo
      • Store the untested embryo (you can decide on testing it again later)
      • Thaw the embryo, take another biopsy of 3-10 cells and re-freeze. However, a thaw, re-biopsy and re-freeze is known to reduce the likelihood that the embryo will implant, and some embryos may not survive being thawed twice.
    • Our ability to accurately detect mosaic embryos in IVF has improved with the most recent version of PGT-A called ‘Next-Generation Sequencing’ or NGS. It is now known that some mosaic embryos result in healthy babies without any chromosome conditions.
    • The decision whether to transfer a mosaic embryo might depend on your personal situation. It may also depend on specific factors about the type of mosaicism, such as:
      • The proportion of cells that are euploid vs aneuploid. A high-level mosaic embryo has mostly aneuploid cells and a few euploid ones. A low-level mosaic embryo has mostly euploid cells and a few aneuploid ones.
      • The specific chromosomes involved determine the type of condition that can result. For example, Down syndrome is caused by having an extra copy of chromosome 21, while Turner syndrome is caused by a missing X chromosome.
      • The number of chromosomes involved: embryos can be mosaic for one or for multiple chromosomes
      • The amount of the chromosome affected: whether it is the whole chromosome that is added or missing, or only part of a chromosome (this is called a segmental mosaicism)
    • When deciding whether to transfer an embryo based on PGT-A results, support will be provided by IVF clinicians and genetic counsellors at the clinic. The decision can depend on lots of different factors, so it is important that the discussion and advice is tailored to each person’s specific circumstances.
  • PGT-A tests whether an embryo has the expected or typical number of chromosomes. This is different to testing of embryos for known or inherited gene conditions, where one or both parents are known carriers – these tests are called PGT for Monogenic conditions (PGT-M) and PGT for Structural Rearrangement (PGT-SR). The information on this page is only about PGT-A.

Why might PGT-A improve IVF outcomes?

PGT-A is not intended to increase the chance of getting pregnant. It aims to reduce the chance of transferring an embryo with an extra or missing chromosome. This may:

  • Reduce the chance of negative outcomes of aneuploid embryos, such as implantation failure, miscarriage, and the birth of a baby with a chromosome condition.
  • Reduce the time and number of transfers it takes before the patient gets pregnant. In this way, it could help patients to get pregnant and have a baby faster.
  • Reduce the costs of undergoing repeated embryo transfer cycles.

Why might PGT-A not improve IVF outcomes?

  • PGT-A is not 100% accurate, and there is a small chance of an incorrect result, known as false positives or false negatives, leading to incorrect identification of euploid and aneuploid embryos. An incorrect result occurs in less than 5% of biopsies.
  • PGT-A test result may come back as ‘inconclusive’. Sometimes the patient or clinic might decide not to transfer an ‘inconclusive’ embryo. If the embryo was actually euploid, the patient may lose an opportunity for a successful embryo transfer.
  • Only a small sample of cells are taken from the embryo. While the accuracy of this result is usually high, it is possible that the sample of cells taken will not be an accurate reflection of the rest of the embryo. For example, the biopsy could happen to sample part of the embryo that is aneuploid, when the rest of the embryo is actually euploid.
  • The cells of a blastocyst embryo are grouped into two parts: the inner cell mass and the trophectoderm (see Figure below). The trophectoderm cells will develop into the placenta. The inner cell mass will develop into the baby. The PGT-A process takes cells from the trophectoderm of the embryo, so that it does not disturb the cells that will go on to form the baby. However, these cells are not necessarily an accurate reflection of the cells in the inner cell mass. Studies have shown that a euploid or aneuploid PGT-A result on a trophectoderm biopsy sample is very likely to match the rest of the embryo. However, it is not possible to make this same prediction for a mosaic PGT-A result because the inner cell mass could be euploid, aneuploid, or mosaic.
  • The embryo could be damaged during the biopsy process. This is more likely if the embryo is low grade (based on its morphology or shape), but may also occur in high grade embryos.
  • Some embryos may not survive the freezing and thawing process required for PGT-A, reducing the number of suitable embryos for transfer. Approximately 2-5% of embryos do not survive the freezing and thawing process. However, it is important to remember that freezing and thawing embryos is a standard and widely used practice in IVF.

PGT-A showing aneuploid, euploid and mosaic embryo composition

Who might consider PGT-A testing for IVF?

People who have experienced


Understanding PGT-A success rates in IVF

Cumulative outcomes and measuring success rates of PGT-A

When deciding whether PGT-A is worth it, it helps to think about IVF as a “complete IVF cycle” rather than just one embryo transfer.

During an IVF cycle, multiple embryos may be created from the eggs collected at one egg retrieval. These embryos can be transferred over several months in one or more embryo transfer procedures (e.g., one fresh transfer followed by one or more frozen transfers).

A complete IVF cycle includes all embryo transfers from a single egg retrieval—both fresh and frozen. However, with PGT-A, there is no fresh embryo transfer, so the complete IVF cycle only includes all frozen embryo transfers from that retrieval.

How we measure 'success' in IVF

We can assess IVF outcomes (e.g., pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage) in two ways. Let's use the example of 'pregnancy':

  • The chance of pregnancy after the first embryo transfer.
  • The cumulative chance of pregnancy from a complete IVF cycle —meaning the total chance of pregnancy across all embryo transfers from the same IVF cycle.

It is important to look at the outcome both ways. This is because it is possible that PGT-A could improve the chance of getting pregnant from the first transfer, but also reduce your overall chance of getting pregnant from one complete IVF cycle (see ‘Why might PGT-A not work’ above).

Does PGT-A testing in IVF work? What the evidence says

Cumulative outcomes from multiple embryo transfers

It is unclear whether PGT-A affects the overall chance having a baby from multiple embryo transfers, both fresh and frozen. Only three trials followed up the participants for multiple embryo transfers. The evidence is considered very low-quality because the studies reported very different results and the results are imprecise. In addition, the studies had important design limitations: the studies did not test all the embryos in the PGT-A group, and they did not follow participants for all relevant embryo transfers. This doesn’t reflect how PGT-A is typically done in real-life practice, where all embryos are usually tested and all euploid embryos are transferred.

PGT-A may decrease the overall chance of getting pregnant from multiple embryo transfers. Two trials followed up participants for multiple embryo transfers. The evidence is considered low quality because the studies did not test all the embryos in the PGT-A group, and they did not follow participants for all relevant embryo transfers. This doesn’t reflect how PGT-A is typically done in real-life practice, where all embryos are usually tested and all euploid embryos are transferred.

It may seem surprising that PGT-A appears to decrease the overall chance of getting pregnant from multiple embryo transfers. It may be because the existing studies did not use an optimal design, or it may be because PGT-A really doesn’t offer any benefit for these outcomes. See ‘why might PGT-A not improve IVF outcomes’ above.

Outcomes from the first embryo transfer of an IVF cycle

When considering just the first embryo transfer of an IVF cycle, it is unclear whether PGT-A affects the chance of having a baby, however it appears to have no effect on the chance of getting pregnant. PGT-A does appear to reduce the chance of miscarriage. This is based on the results of seven trials; the evidence is rated as moderate quality because the studies mostly included younger participants who had many good-quality embryos. This may not represent the typical group of people offered PGT-A in Australia, as it is often used by older people with fewer embryos.

It may seem surprising that PGT-A appears to have no effect on the chance of getting pregnant from IVF. It may be because the existing studies did not use an optimal design, or it may be because PGT-A really doesn’t offer any benefit for these outcomes. See ‘why might PGT-A not improve IVF outcomes’ above.

Cumulative live birth

The chance of live birth from multiple embryo transfers

Unclear

It is unclear whether PGT-A affects the overall chance of having a baby from multiple embryo transfers

3 randomised trials 1,762 participants

Quality of evidence

Very low

The studies reported varying and imprecise results. Most participants were young and studies did not test and follow all the embryos in the PGT-A group which does not reflect how PGT-A is usually performed.

Cumulative pregnancy

The chance of getting pregnant from multiple embryo transfers

Possible decrease

9 fewer per 100 people

PGT-A may decrease the overall chance of getting pregnant from multiple embryo transfers

2 randomised trial 1,662 participants

Quality of evidence

Low

Most participants were young and studies did not test and follow all the embryos in the PGT-A group which does not reflect how PGT-A is usually performed.

Cumulative miscarriage

The chance of miscarriage from multiple embryo transfers

Possible decrease

5 fewer per 100 people

PGTA may decrease the overall chance of miscarriage from multiple embryo transfers

2 randomised trials 1,662 participants

Quality of evidence

Low

Most participants were young and studies did not test and follow all the embryos in the PGT-A group which does not reflect how PGT-A is usually performed.

Time to live birth

How long it takes before having a baby from IVF

Unclear

It is unclear whether PGT-A affects the time it takes to have a baby from one complete IVF cycle

2 randomised trial 1,662 participants

Quality of evidence

Very low

Two studies reported varied results. The studies also did not test and follow all the embryos in the PGT-A group, and they did not follow participants for all relevant embryo transfers.

Live birth

The chance of live birth from the first embryo transfer

Unclear

It is unclear whether PGT-A affects the chance of having a baby from IVF

6 randomised trials 2,784 participants

Quality of evidence

Low

Most participants were young and had multiple blastocyst embryos, which may not represent people having PGT-A in all settings. The results were also imprecise.

Pregnancy

The chance of getting pregnant from the first embryo transfer

No effect

PGT-A does not make a difference to the chance of getting pregnant from IVF

7 randomised trials 2,896 participants

Quality of evidence

Moderate

Most participants were young and had multiple blastocyst embryos, which may not represent people having PGT-A in all settings

Miscarriage

The chance of miscarriage from the first embryo transfer

Decrease

3 fewer per 100 people

PGT-A decreases the chance of having a miscarriage from IVF

7 randomised trials 2,896 participants

Quality of evidence

Moderate

Most participants were young and had multiple blastocyst embryos, which may not represent people having PGT-A in all settings.

  • Trial Reason for exclusion

    Blockeel 2008

    Used FISH (an old type of analysis)

    De Munck 2022

    Eggs were randomised rather than people

    Debrock 2010

    Used FISH (an old type of analysis)

    Forman 2013

    Trial compares two untested embryos vs 1 PGT-A tested euploid embryo – irrelevant comparison

    Hardarson 2008

    Used FISH (an old type of analysis)

    Ismayilova 2025Not randomised

    Jansen 2008

    Used FISH (an old type of analysis)

    Mastenbroek 2007

    Used FISH (an old type of analysis)

    Meyer 2009

    Used FISH (an old type of analysis)

    Ozgur 2019

    Only tested one embryo in PGT-A arm – not relevant to standard practice

    Schoolcraft 2009

    Used FISH (an old type of analysis)

    Staessen 2004

    Used FISH (an old type of analysis)

    Staessen 2008

    Used FISH (an old type of analysis)

    Sui 2020

    Trial compares two untested embryos vs 1 PGT-A tested euploid embryo – irrelevant comparison

    Rubio 2017

    Embryo biopsy performed on day 3

    Verpoest 2018

    Biopsy of polar body rather than trophectoderm

    Werlin 2003

    Used FISH (an old type of analysis)

    Yang 2019

    Trial not prospectively registered

Only studies performing PGT-A as currently practiced in Australia were considered, specifically those involving trophectoderm blastocyst biopsy and analysis of all chromosomes rather than just some.

We only include data from randomised controlled trials because these studies provide the most reliable evidence about whether an IVF option is effective and safe. Learn more about our IVF research methods.

Side effects of PGT-A

Side effects are not usually relevant for lab-based optional extras like PGT-A.

However, each additional handling step in the IVF lab, including the biopsy of an embryo, adds some level of potential risk. There is a very small chance of damaging the embryo during the biopsy procedure.


Risks of PGT-A testing and long-term outcomes

There are no known risks or long-term harms related to taking a biopsy of the embryo for PGT-A.

PGT-A requires a frozen embryo transfer. Compared to a fresh embryo transfer, some types of frozen embryo transfer where medication is used thicken the uterine lining, may be associated with some risk. These are risk related to a frozen transfer, rather than PGT-A itself.

Compared to a fresh embryo transfer, PGT-A and frozen embryo transfer may be associated with an increased risk of

  • Pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
  • High birthweight or babies that are larger than normal at birth

Compared to a fresh embryo transfer, PGT-A and frozen embryo transfer may be associated with a reduced risk of

  • Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

This is based on data from randomised controlled trials and input from IVF specialists. Possible risks of harm and long-term outcomes are often not reported in randomised trials and therefore it is unknown whether PGT-A poses any other risk of harm to the IVF patient or the embryo/baby.

Earlier versions of PGT-A technology have been used in Australia since approximately 2004. PGT-A using Next-Generation Sequencing has been used in Australia since 2014, and approximately 60,000 IVF cycles have used PGT-A with next-generation sequencing.


Cost of PGT-A testing in IVF

PGT-A usually costs between $500-1,000 AUD per embryo, which includes the cost to biopsy and test the embryo. In Australia, there is currently no Medicare rebate for PGT-A (although PGT-M and PGT-SR are covered by Medicare).

Cost information is indicative only, costs can vary from clinic to clinic and depending on different circumstances.


Practical considerations about PGT-A testing

  • PGT-A is often considered when patients have multiple embryos, as it aims to help prioritise which embryos to transfer first. For people with few embryos, it may not be as useful for decision making.
  • Some patients may not have any embryos suitable for biopsy. Different IVF clinics will have different criteria that they apply to decide whether embryo biopsy is a suitable or possible option, and some embryos may not meet this criteria.
  • All embryos must be frozen while waiting for the PGT-A test results, which means a fresh embryo transfer is not possible unless an untested embryo is transferred, or a tested embryo that was created in a previous cycle is transferred. Because of this, PGT-A adds time to the IVF cycle and results in a delay of about 1-2 months. Some Australian clinics send the embryo biopsy overseas for PGT-A analysis, while the embryo remains frozen at the clinic.
  • PGT-A is available in all states in Australia, however there are restrictions on who can access PGT-A in WA.

How to talk to your IVF specialist about this research

Use our guide to help you discuss IVF options with your doctor or IVF specialist. Helping you get the facts to make an informed decision for your IVF treatments.

Questions to ask your IVF specialist

A collection of cells

Disclaimer: Evidence-based IVF is a web-based resource that provides evidence-based information based on research and other data. Content on the Evidence-based IVF webpage is provided for information purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for medical advice. You should consult with qualified and appropriately experienced medical professionals when considering the information from this webpage. Scientific studies and clinical trial results are continually being published. While considerable care has been taken, The University of Melbourne cannot, and does not make any representations and gives no warranties that the information associated with the Evidence-based IVF webpage is in every respect correct, current, complete, reliable, or suitable for any purpose and use is entirely at your own risk.

Stay up-to-date with the latest evidence

We’ll share any updates to our evidence and new IVF optional extras added

Subscribe to stay up-to-date

We collect your name and email address for the purpose of informing you about our website updates or if a new treatment option has been incorporated. We will only use your email address and any other personal information you provide for this purpose, and your information will be handled and disclosed in accordance with the University’s Privacy Policy (MPF1104). For more detail, please see our Privacy Collection Notice.

University of Melbourne logo
Produced by the University of Melbourne
Cochrane logo
In collaboration with Cochrane
Australian Government logo
Funded by the Australian Government