Search  | A-Z Directory  | Contacting People  | About Us [Undergraduate Handbook]
University of Melbourne

ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND SAFETY MANUAL - NEW

3. RISK MANAGEMENT [Planning]

[? Search] [Top] [Contents]
[Prev: 2. ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICIES [Policy]]
[Next: 4. LEGAL & OTHER REQUIREMENTS [Planning]]


Contents:
3.1. NEW. EHS RISK MANAGEMENT
3.1.1. New. PURPOSE
3.1.2. New. SCOPE
3.1.3. New. DEFINITIONS
3.1.4. New. PROCEDURE
3.1.5. New. REFERENCES
3.1.6. New. DOCUMENT CONTROL

3.1. NEW. EHS RISK MANAGEMENT

3.1.1. New. PURPOSE

To describe the University of Melbourne's methodology for:

The procedure also provides direction on the use of risk management tools for specific hazards and environmental aspects.

3.1.2. New. SCOPE

This procedure applies to all staff and students at all of the University of Melbourne's campuses and each of the University's controlled entities.

3.1.3. New. DEFINITIONS

Hazard

A source or a situation with a potential for harm in terms of human injury or ill-health, damage to property, damage to the environment, or a combination of these. AS/NZS 4801

Hazard Identification

The process of recognizing that a hazard exists and defining its characteristics. AS/NZS 4801

Hierarchy of Control

A Hierarchy of Control [HC] is used to eliminate or manage the risks to as low a level as practicable. It is listed below in order of effectiveness.

a. Elimination:

Remove the hazard. eg eliminating a requirement to carry out the task, use a piece of equipment or utilise a chemical.

b. Substitution:

Replace the material, plant or work practice with a less hazardous one. eg. replacing a hazardous chemical with a less hazardous one.

c. Engineering Controls:

Engineering the solution to minimise risk is highly desirable as the process reduces the reliance on human behaviour to effect long lasting positive change. There are a number of aspects to engineering controls.

  • One may redesign the way in which work is performed, modify equipment to change the way a task is performed or engineer change to the process steps to eliminate hazardous activity. One may also completely automate a process where there is minimal or no human interaction.

  • One may isolate a hazard by physically guarding the hazard, enclosing the hazard thus preventing human contact, may lock a process/equipment thus preventing access by any unauthorised personnel, may remove the hazard by engineering means such as ventilation.

d. Administration Controls:

Administration controls are the procedural aspects of managing hazards, such as planned and preventative maintenance programs, standard operating procedures, lock out/tag out procedures, education and training and the rotation of staff thus minimising exposure.

e. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE):

Personal Protective Equipment is the last and least effective control method used. It involves staff wearing appropriate PPE such as steel mesh gloves, safety shoes, aprons, goggles etc, to isolate the person from the hazard. Any breakdown of the system immediately exposes the worker to the hazard. This control method is not highly effective because it relies totally on human behaviour. PPE often forms part of the 'short term' controls methodology.

Health and safety representative [HSR]

A health and safety representative for a designated work group who has been elected and holds office in accordance with Part 7 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004.

Incident

Any unplanned event resulting in, or having a potential for injury, ill health, damage or other loss. AS/NZS 4801

Job Safety Analysis [JSA]

A job safety analysis separates the tasks people perform into subtasks. For each subtask, hazards and risks are sought by considering the hazards that might exist and what might go wrong to cause injury or ill health. The tools and equipment which are used and the environment in which the task is carried out must also be considered. [HB 205-2004]

The JSA process requires:

  1. identification of hazards associated with steps involved in each principal task,

  2. assessment of the level of risk associated with the identified hazards and

  3. developing risk control strategies to eliminate or reduce the level of risk

associated with each principal task.

Near Miss

A near miss is an event that could have resulted in human injury or damage to property, process or the environment.

Risk

(In relation to any potential injury or harm.) The likelihood and consequence of that injury or harm occurring. AS/NZS 4801

Risk Assessment

(In relation to any potential injury or harm.) The likelihood and consequence of that injury or harm occurring. AS/NZS 4801

Risk Management

Risk management is: the culture, processes and structures that are directed towards realising potential opportunities whilst managing adverse effects. HB 203 2004

Risk Register

A list of hazards, associated risks (pre and post control) and controls, sorted in order of the highest to lowest risk.

Risk Control Plan

A Risk Control Plan is an action plan that sets out how the EHS risks identified in a Risk Assessment will be eliminated or controlled. Risk Control Plans are developed from risk assessments. Risk Control Plans may include a list of:

  • hazards identified

  • risks associated with the hazards identified

  • existing risk controls

  • proposed short-term controls (including proposed completion dates)

  • proposed medium-term controls (including proposed completion dates)

  • proposed long-term controls (including proposed completion dates)

  • person(s) responsible for implementation of controls

  • resources required for implementation of controls

  • proposed review date.

Plant and Equipment

Includes-

  1. any machinery, equipment, appliance, implement and tool; and

  2. any component of any of those things; and

  3. anything fitted, connected or related to any of those things; OHS Act 2004

Chemicals and Substances

Any natural or artificial substance, whether in the form of a solid, liquid, gas or vapour; OHS Act 2004

Systems of work

Methods, procedures and practices by which work is to be carried out

Buildings, Structure and Work Environments

Means a place, whether or not in a building or structure, where employees or self-employed persons work, and includes a car, truck, ship, boat, airplane and any other vehicle; OHS Act 2004

Aspect

The organisation shall establish and maintain procedures to identify the environmental aspects of its activities, products and services that it can control and over which it can be expected to have an influence, in order to determine those which have or cannot have significant impacts on the environment. The organisation shall ensure that the aspects related to these significant impacts are considered in setting its environmental objectives. ISO 14001

Environment

Surroundings in which an organisation operates including air, water, land, natural resources flora, fauna, humans, and their interrelation ISO 14001

Impact

Any change to the environment, whether averse or beneficial, wholly or partly resulting from an organisation's activities, products or services. ISO 14001

Risk Control

That part of risk management which involves the implementation of policies, standards and procedures or physical changes to eliminate or minimise adverse risks. HB 203:2004

3.1.4. New. PROCEDURE

The University of Melbourne shall, so far as is practicable, identify health and safety hazards and environmental aspects associated with University-controlled:

The University of Melbourne shall assess the level of risk associated with identified hazards and environmental aspects; and develop and implement risk controls, so far as is practicable, to ensure a safe and healthy workplace with minimal environmental impact.

The environment health and safety risk management process shall occur using the processes, procedures and tools set out below.

3.1.4.1. New. EHS Risk Management Methodology

3.1.4.1.1. New. Local Hazard Identification

Hazards will be identified at the workplace level and reported to the local supervisor by:

3.1.4.1.2. New. Risk Assessment Tools

All University of Melbourne risk assessments shall use risk assessment methodology encompassing:

All University of Melbourne risk assessments shall reference the Hierarchy of Controls when undertaking risk assessments in order to formulate the most effective control method.

The General Manager EHS shall develop and publish a suite of risk management tools consistent with the University of Melbourne risk assessment methodology. These tools may include:

3.1.4.1.3. New. Two Variable Risk Matrix

(Adapted from HB 436:2004 Risk Management Guidelines, Companion to AS/NZS 4360:2004.)

Step 1: Consider the consequence of exposure to the hazard.

Using the table below, determine as realistically as possible, the consequence resulting from exposure to the hazard.

 Table 4: Two Variable Risk Matrix: Definition of Consequences

 

Consequences 

Types 

Security level 

Health and Safety  

Natural Environment  

Multiple fatalities, or significant irreversible effects to >50 persons 

Very serious, long-term environment impairment of ecosystem functions. 

IV 

Single fatality and/or severe irreversible disability (>30%) to one or more persons 

Very serious, long-term environment impairment of ecosystem functions. 

III 

Moderate irreversible disability or impairment (<30%) to one or more persons 

Serious medium term environment effects 

II 

Objective but reversible disability requiring hospitalization 

Moderate, short-term effects but not affecting ecosystem functions 

No medical treatment required 

Minor effects on biological of physical environment 

Step 2: Consider the likelihood of the exposure to the hazard occurring.

Using the table below, determine the likelihood of exposure to the hazard resulting in the consequence determined in Step 1. Consider the how frequently the activity is conducted in determining the likelihood.

 Table 5: Two Variable Risk Matrix: Definition of Likelihood

Level  

Descriptor  

Description  

Indicative Frequency (expected to occur)  

Almost certain 

The event will occur on an annual basis 

Once a year or more frequently 

Likely 

The event has occurred several times or more in your career 

Once every three years 

Possible 

The event might occur once in your career 

Once every ten years 

Unlikely 

The event does occur somewhere from time to time 

Once every thirty years 

Rare 

Heard of something like the occurring elsewhere 

Once every 100 years 

Step 3: Using the Two Variable Risk Matrix table below, determine the Risk Rating from the consequence and likelihood descriptors.

To use the Two Variable Risk Matrix:

  • Identify the consequence descriptor that best describes the consequences of the exposure to the hazard.

  • Identify the likelihood descriptor that best describes the likelihood of exposure to the hazard resulting in the consequence determined in Step 1.

  • The Risk Rating is providing in the box where the Likelihood row and Consequence column meet.

 Table 6: Two Variable Risk Matrix
 

Consequences 

Label 

Likelihood Label 

II 

III 

IV 

Medium 

High 

High 

Very high 

Very high 

Medium 

Medium 

High 

High 

Very high 

Low 

Medium 

High 

High 

High 

Low 

Low 

Medium 

Medium 

High 

Low 

Low 

Medium 

Medium 

High 

Note: The relationship between consequence and likelihood will differ for each application: the level of risk assigned to each cell needs to reflect this.

3.1.4.1.4. New. Three Variable Risk Calculator

(Adapted from Fine, Journal of Safety Research 1971, contained in HB205-2004 OHS Risk Management Handbook.)

 Table 7: Three Variable Risk Calculator

Consequence 

C 

Exposure 

E 

Likelihood 

L 

Catastrophe: Multiple fatalities, permanent extensive environmental damage. 

100 

Continuously or many times daily. 

10 

Almost certain: The most likely outcome if the event occurs. 

10 

Disaster: Fatality, permanent local, damage to environment. 

50 

Frequently: Approximately once daily. 

6 

Likely: Not unusual, perhaps 50-50 chance. 

6 

Very serious: Permanent disability/ill health, non-permanent environmental damage. 

25 

Occasionally: Once a week to once a month. 

3 

Unusual but possible: (e.g. 1 in 10). 

3 

Serious: Non-permanent injury or ill health. Adverse effect on environment. 

15 

Infrequent: Once a month to once a year. 

2 

Remotely possible: A possible coincidence (e.g. 1 in 100). 

1 

Important: Medical attention needed, off-site emission but no damage. 

5 

Rare: Has been known to occur. 

1 

Conceivable: Has never happened in years of exposure but is possible (e.g. 1 in 1,000). 

0.5 

Noticeable: Minor cuts and bruises or sickness, small loss of containment, no off-site consequences. 

1 

Very rare: Not known to have occurred. 

0.5 

Practically impossible: Not to knowledge ever happened anywhere (e.g. 1 in 10,000). 

0.1 

Risk Score = C x E X L 

Risk Score 

Risk Rating 

> 600 

Very High 

300-599 

High 

90-299 

Moderate 

< 90 

Low 

3.1.4.2. New. Local Workplace EHS Risk Management

Supervisors and/or Managers in consultation with HSR and employees where practicable, shall identify hazards present in the local workplace and assess the risk of each identified hazard using the University of Melbourne EHS Risk Management Methodology.

The Supervisor or Manager, in consultation with HSR and employees where practicable, shall develop control plans in accordance with the hierarchy of control. The Supervisor or Manager shall decide upon the controls to be implemented and undertake one or more of the following actions:

The Supervisor or Manager shall record any action that has been taken to remove or mitigate the risk on the relevant hazard-reporting document.

The Supervisor or Manager shall ensure that the controls implemented are reviewed and the effectiveness of the risk controls monitored.

The Supervisor or Manager shall ensure that a record of the identification, assessment and control process is maintained.

3.1.4.3. New. Acquisition/Manufacture of Plant and Equipment

Managers and Supervisors of Purchasing Officers (or those manufacturing plant or equipment) shall ensure that a pre-purchase risk assessment is completed, in consultation with HSR and employees where practicable, for the plant or equipment prior the completion a purchase order (or commencement of manufacture) of any plant or equipment, unless a risk assessment has already been completed. The pre-purchase risk assessment shall consider:

3.1.4.4. New. Acquisition of Chemicals & Substances

Managers and supervisors of Purchasing Officers shall ensure that a pre-purchase risk assessment is completed, in consultation with HSR and employees where practicable, for chemical or substances prior the completion a purchase order for chemical or substance, unless a risk assessment has already been completed. The pre-purchase risk assessment shall consider:

3.1.4.5. New. New or altered systems of work

Managers and Supervisors establishing new systems of work or substantially altering existing systems of work, shall ensure that Job Safety Analysis [JSA] (risk assessment) is completed, in consultation with HSR and employees where practicable, for the system of work prior the commencement of the new or altered system of work, unless a risk assessment has already been completed. The JSA (risk assessment) shall consider:

3.1.4.6. New. Acquisition and Leasing of Buildings and Acquisition of Operational Entities

The Vice Principal Property and Campus Services (P&CS) or other persons responsible for:

shall ensure that a risk assessment for all proposed new and altered work environments is completed prior the acquisition or lease commences. The need to include the following items in the risk assessment shall be considered:

The Vice Principal (Property & Campus Services) or other persons responsible for:

shall ensure the hazards identified and risks assessed in the risk assessment, have suitable risk controls developed, documented and budgeted for, prior to the acquisition or lease any building or the acquisition of any operational entity.

3.1.4.7. New. Design of New Buildings and Building Refurbishments

The Vice Principal (Property & Campus Services) or other persons responsible for:

shall ensure that the Designer of the new building or building refurbishment completes a risk assessment for all proposed new and altered work environments to ensure that the building or structure is designed to be safe and without risks to the health of the persons using the building or structure as a workplace prior the commencement of the refurbishment. The risk assessment shall consider:

The Vice Principal (Property & Campus Services) or other persons responsible for:

shall ensure that the Designer of the new building or building refurbishment provides that the hazards identified and risks assessed in the risk assessment, have suitable risk controls developed, documented and budgeted for, prior the commencement of the refurbishment or construction of the building.

3.1.4.8. New. EHS Risk Register

The GM EHS shall establish, maintain and publish a University-wide register of the University's Environmental Aspects and Impacts. The Aspects and Impacts Register shall include:

The GM EHS shall establish, maintain and publish a University-wide register of the University's Occupational Health and Safety risks. The Occupational Health and Safety Risk Register shall include:

The Dean or Vice-Principal of each Budget Division (Faculty) shall establish and maintain an EHS Risk Register describing the primary EHS risks pertaining to the operations of the Budget Division (Faculty).

The Budget Division (Faculty) Risk Register will be incorporate risks identified from existing risk assessments within the Budget Division (Faculty) and from the University's generic EHS Risk Register.

The Dean or Vice Principal of each Budget Division (Faculty) shall maintain the Environmental Aspects and Impacts Register and the Health and Safety Risk Register to ensure all changes to the identified hazards, level of risk or risk controls established through subsequent risk assessments are included and the Registers are current.

3.1.4.9. New. High Consequence Operations

The Deans, Vice Principals (Property & Campus Services) or other persons responsible for the establishment of potentially High Consequence operations shall, in consultation with the HSR and employees where practicable, consider Permit to Work procedures as a control measure for all identified High Consequence Operations.

High Consequence Operations may include:

3.1.5. New. REFERENCES

AS 4801 2001 Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems

AS 14001 2001 Environmental Management Systems - Specifications and Guidelines

Occupational and Health and Safety Act (Vic) 2004

HB 203 2004 Environmental Risk Management Principles and Process Handbook

HB 205-2004 OHS Risk Management Handbook

HB 436-2004 Risk Management Handbook

AS 4804 Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems

AS 4360 Risk Management

3.1.6. New. DOCUMENT CONTROL

 Table 8: Document Control: 3.1.New. EHS Risk Management

Date: 30 May 2006 

Version: 1.0 

Authorised by: OHSC on 4 April 2006, RMC on 30 May 2006. 

Next Review: 30 May 2009 

© The University of Melbourne - Uncontrolled when printed 


[? Search] [Top] [Contents]
[Prev: 2. ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICIES [Policy]]
[Next: 4. LEGAL & OTHER REQUIREMENTS [Planning]]



The University of Melbourne ABN: 84 002 705 224
CRICOS Provider Number: 00116K (More information)
© The University of Melbourne 1994-2006. Disclaimer and Copyright Information. Privacy Policy.


Created: January 2000
Last Modified: 13 August 2009
Authorised by: General Manager, Environment Health and Safety Unit.
    
Maintained by: EHSM Maintainer ehsm-webmaster@unimelb.edu.au
[HTML 4.0 Checked!]